Spark is working to accelerate scientific understanding and action on natural feedbacks and support work to better quantify and reduce the risk of greenhouse gas emissions from warming natural systems.
Support the ProgramAs humans have heated up the planet, there is growing evidence that greenhouse gas emissions from natural processes—permafrost thaw, wetland methane production, soil carbon loss, ocean outgassing, wildfires—have begun to rise. These emissions pose a significant risk and are a major blind spot in current climate models and policies, including Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment reports and Paris Agreement frameworks. Spark is working to better quantify these emissions, incorporate them into key policy frameworks, and assess potential mitigation strategies.
Some of these changes result in more greenhouse gas emissions, including not only carbon dioxide but also super pollutants such as methane and nitrous oxide. These "climate feedbacks" add to ongoing human-driven emissions and further exacerbate climate change.
For example, in the arctic-boreal region, carbon dioxide emissions are increasing as permafrost thaws and wildfires increase, and in temperate regions, nitrous oxide emissions from agriculture are increasing as soils warm. Meanwhile, tropical wetlands are emerging as sources of increased methane emissions.
These systems hold significant potential for increased greenhouse gas emissions. Despite being long-anticipated, our scientific understanding, as well as measurement and modeling of these emissions, is not well-developed. Better understanding the drivers of these natural emissions and how they will evolve under a warming world is critical if we are to return to a safe and stable climate.
Rising warming-induced emissions means:
Observations suggest warming-induced emissions from tropical wetlands are a primary driver of recent atmospheric methane concentration increases, and 2024 saw the largest annual recorded rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide, likely related to weakening carbon uptake in the tropics.
By the end of the century, warming-induced CO2 and CH4 emissions from permafrost thaw are estimated to be at least 100 GtCO2e, equivalent to nearly two years of present-day energy and industrial emissions.
Doing so will support:
It is imperative that this knowledge comes in addition to aggressively reducing anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide.
We are working with scientific experts in the field, hosting workshops and convenings, mapping data gaps and research bottlenecks, and identifying areas ripe for support to unlock more rapid progress.
Do you have ideas of places that need more attention, expert convening, or coordination around warming-induced greenhouse gas emissions? Please reach out. We love all flavors of input.
Contact UsSign up to be kept informed of developments in this program area, including literature highlights, upcoming convenings, or topical grant calls.
The Global Methane Budget indicates that ~40% of global methane emissions come from natural sources while the other ~60% come from anthropogenic sources.
Natural sources of methane predominantly come from wetlands, biomass and biofuel burning and other natural sources such as inland waters, geologic sources, oceans, termites, wild animals, permafrost, and vegetation.
Natural methane sources are changing in many different ways. At a high level, permafrost is thawing at a rapid rate due to amplified warming in the Arctic which is triggering significant ecosystem and hydrologic changes which all affect methane emissions. Wetlands are also changing due to elevated warming, changing precipitation patterns and intensities, as well as changes to carbon inputs. These system changes are inherently complicated but the net effect appears to be an increase in natural methane emissions especially in the tropics although the exact mechanism for that elevated release (whether it be increased wetland extent, higher intensity precipitation, or more frequent cycles of plant growth and decomposition) is an active area of research.
While the Arctic serves as a significant source of methane from wetlands, lakes, and thawing permafrost, most of the natural methane emissions comes from the tropics. The strong latitudinal gradient in wetland emissions shows that the largest emissions occur in the tropics where it is wetter and warmer and there is a lot more biological activity.
The tropics are a major source of methane due to elevated temperature and precipitation which results in extensive wetland areas found in this region, which are ideal environments for the production of methane. The warm and moist conditions found in the tropics accelerate both the growth of biomass and its subsequent decomposition, further increasing methane emissions. It is estimated that there is approximately 10 times more methane emitted in the tropics versus the high latitudes.
Rising temperatures are expected to be a primary driver increasing emissions of methane from natural sources such as wetlands. Increased precipitation, expanded wetland extent and thawing permafrost are also all expected to be drivers of elevated methane emissions from natural systems. However there remain large uncertainties over the magnitude and rate of this increase.
Identifying the source of methane or “source attribution” is challenging when methane concentrations are measured from aerial observations like satellites. Isotopic signatures provide something similar to a fingerprint to separate certain categories of methane sources. However due to overlap of some of the source signatures it is difficult to separate methane from a cow versus a wetland.
There are currently not many “solutions” for natural emissions of methane. Because these natural systems are geographically large and diverse and are by definition not “managed” they are not easily amenable to solutions such as land management practices, amendments of methane inhibition, or solutions that target higher concentration sources such as from the oil and gas sectors.
While natural emissions may not be amenable to emission reductions in the same way as anthropogenic emissions, it is important to study and understand the underlying process controls of natural emissions so that we can (1) ensure that natural emissions are adequately represented in global climate models and the IPCC process which will allow us to (2) better predict future emissions and temperature trajectories, and (3) ensure that anthropogenic emission reduction targets are reflective of rising natural emissions.
Menu
Stay in touch
Sign up to our Spark newsletter and stay updated!
made by
tonik.com